• <nav id="c8c2c"></nav>
      • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
      • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
      • <nav id="c8c2c"><sup id="c8c2c"></sup></nav>
        <tr id="c8c2c"></tr>
      • a级毛片av无码,久久精品人人爽人人爽,国产r级在线播放,国产在线高清一区二区

        English 中文網(wǎng) 漫畫網(wǎng) 愛新聞iNews 翻譯論壇
        中國網(wǎng)站品牌欄目(頻道)
        當(dāng)前位置: Language Tips> 譯通四海> 專家點評

        Truth lies somewhere in the middle

        [ 2010-09-01 17:30]     字號 [] [] []  
        免費訂閱30天China Daily雙語新聞手機報:移動用戶編輯短信CD至106580009009

        Truth lies somewhere in the middle

        Reader's question:  The rationale is that when you hear two parties at extreme ends on a given principle, we tend to think that "the truth lies somewhere in the middle." Is this really so? Let's consider a few points.

        Could you explain “the truth lies somewhere in the middle”?

        My comments:

        When two people have an extremely different opinion on the same issue, you can be sure that neither party is totally right.

        Or wrong.

        What's most probable is that one party is right to a certain extent, while the other is correct on certain other points. In other words, "the truth is something in between" – you can't trust the words of one party. You'd better, instead, listen to both parties before finding a middle ground.

        When, for example, two people quarrel with each other, both persons tend to give their side of the story – you know, how kind, generous and righteous they're and how mean, wrong and evil the other person is – while denying anything the other person has to say.

        You, as an objective third party, and after listening to both parties, can readily reach a conclusion that neither person is absolutely right. Neither person is totally wrong, either. "The truth", instead, "is somewhere in the middle".

        More often than not, where real-life quarrels are concerned, the real truth is that neither person is so kind, generous and righteous. Obviously, neither person is above quarrelling.

        That much is certain.

        Otherwise there'd have been no quarrel between the two in the first place.

        Related stories:

        For all intents and purposes

        Past praying for

        Nay saying

        Kick sth.when it's down

        Opening credits

        Give somebody a piece of your mind

        God only knows

        Speak of the devil

        Hold a candle to

        Jump the gun

        Be possible if not probable

        Draw a line in the sand

        That's saying a lot

        Come hell or high water

        Right on cue

        Go to Zhang Xin's column

        本文僅代表作者本人觀點,與本網(wǎng)立場無關(guān)。歡迎大家討論學(xué)術(shù)問題,尊重他人,禁止人身攻擊和發(fā)布一切違反國家現(xiàn)行法律法規(guī)的內(nèi)容。

        About the author:

        Zhang Xin has been with China Daily since 1988, when he graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University. Write him at: zhangxin@chinadaily.com.cn, or raise a question for potential use in a future column.

         

         
        中國日報網(wǎng)英語點津版權(quán)說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網(wǎng)英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創(chuàng)作品,除與中國日報網(wǎng)簽署英語點津內(nèi)容授權(quán)協(xié)議的網(wǎng)站外,其他任何網(wǎng)站或單位未經(jīng)允許不得非法盜鏈、轉(zhuǎn)載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯(lián)系;凡本網(wǎng)注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉(zhuǎn)載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉(zhuǎn)載,請與稿件來源方聯(lián)系,如產(chǎn)生任何問題與本網(wǎng)無關(guān);本網(wǎng)所發(fā)布的歌曲、電影片段,版權(quán)歸原作者所有,僅供學(xué)習(xí)與研究,如果侵權(quán),請?zhí)峁┌鏅?quán)證明,以便盡快刪除。
         

        關(guān)注和訂閱

        人氣排行

        翻譯服務(wù)

        中國日報網(wǎng)翻譯工作室

        我們提供:媒體、文化、財經(jīng)法律等專業(yè)領(lǐng)域的中英互譯服務(wù)
        電話:010-84883468
        郵件:translate@chinadaily.com.cn
         
         
        a级毛片av无码
        • <nav id="c8c2c"></nav>
          • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
          • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
          • <nav id="c8c2c"><sup id="c8c2c"></sup></nav>
            <tr id="c8c2c"></tr>