• <nav id="c8c2c"></nav>
      • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
      • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
      • <nav id="c8c2c"><sup id="c8c2c"></sup></nav>
        <tr id="c8c2c"></tr>
      • a级毛片av无码,久久精品人人爽人人爽,国产r级在线播放,国产在线高清一区二区

        US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
        Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

        Market economy status not a bilateral negotiation

        By Yang Yanyi (China Daily) Updated: 2016-02-18 07:55

        Market economy status not a bilateral negotiation

        Ambassador Yang Yanyi, Head of the Chinese Mission to the EU.


        The protectionist sentiment and the confrontational approach that have emerged in the European Union are worrying, as well as being regrettable and misleading.

        On Friday, the European Commission opened new anti-dumping investigations on steel products originating from China, and the European steel industry organized a demonstration against so-called Chinese dumping in the EU market and the granting of Market Economy Status to China.

        Nobody should be under any illusion: overcapacity, including excess capacity in the global steel sector is one of the many challenges we are all faced with. Not only the European steel industry has been hard hit, iron and steel industries in China and many other emerging economies are suffering badly from excessive production and flagging demand.

        According to some estimates, cutting back the overcapacity in China by 30 percent in those industries with most excess capacity-iron and steel, coal, cement, shipbuilding, aluminum and flat glass-is expected to affect the employment of 3 million workers.

        Not to mention that China is also confronted with many other daunting tasks: lifting 70 million people out of poverty, advancing industrialization to transform China into a post-industrial society, rebalancing the economy from investment and net exports to consumption and innovation.

        The situation is serious and requires a response.

        But what kind of response? Grumble, curse, cut the ground from under other's feet? Retreat into protectionism and be at each other's throats?

        If history serves as a guide, these are unwelcome if not irresponsible responses. They may help to give vent to the anger and frustration of some and obtain short-term gains, but they fail to serve the common long-term interests of all.

        Obviously the response to the challenges is up to each and every country. I only wish to share what we believe to be the best possible approach and option, and what China has been doing and will continue to do with regard to the issue.

        First, digest the problem and not dump it onto other's doorsteps.

        The development of the steel industry in China has been mainly to meet its domestic demand, rather than to export products to other countries.

        To effectively deal with the overcapacity problems, China has taken tough measures to control new capacity. Painful as it is, China has cut its steel industry capacity by more than 90 million tons over the past few years and its investment in iron and steel assets by 13 percent last year. The growth of Chinese steel production has basically come to a halt.

        To continue to address overcapacity in a serious and resolute manner, China has made elimination of overcapacity the top priority for this year and will cut the steel industry capacity by another 100 to 150 million tons.

        Previous Page 1 2 3 Next Page

        Most Viewed Today's Top News
        ...
        a级毛片av无码
        • <nav id="c8c2c"></nav>
          • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
          • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
          • <nav id="c8c2c"><sup id="c8c2c"></sup></nav>
            <tr id="c8c2c"></tr>