Bush: Iraq invasion my responsibility (AP) Updated: 2005-12-15 07:17
On the eve of parliamentary elections in Iraq, Bush's speech was meant to
wrap up an aggressive push-back against war critics with an overarching
explanation, nearly three years later, of why he went into Iraq and why he
believes U.S. troops must remain there.
Bush predicted a higher turnout than in earlier balloting of Iraq's minority
Sunni Arabs in Thursday's voting, which will establish Iraq's first permanent,
democratically elected government. The Sunnis provide the backbone of the
insurgency and largely shunned Jan. 30 elections for an interim Parliament that
wrote the nation's constitution. Their participation was higher in the October
election to adopt the constitution.
But the president also said that Americans shouldn't hope for violence to
wane, and shouldn't even expect to know results before early January.
"We can ... expect that the elections will be followed by days of
uncertainty," he said. "It's going to take awhile."
Wednesday's remarks followed a pattern of more frank talk from Bush on Iraq.
Each installment in the recent round of Iraq speeches, which began last month at
the Naval Academy, has included descriptions of fixes for early mistakes and
sober assessments of remaining challenges.
That reflects the majority of Americans who, confronted with daily doses of
bad news and rising death counts in Iraq, disapprove of Bush's policies there
and question the outlook for victory. For instance, a new poll by the Pew
Research Center for the People & the Press found that most people see
progress in areas such as establishing democracy and training Iraqi security
forces but are split on whether the United States is defeating the insurgents.
U.S. President George W. Bush speaks about the
war in Iraq at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington December 14, 2005.
[Reuters] | Answering critics who have said he's
offered no definition of victory in Iraq, Bush offered a succinct summation.
"Victory will be achieved by meeting certain objectives: when the terrorists
and Saddamists can no longer threaten Iraq's democracy, when the Iraqi security
forces can protect their own people and when Iraq is not a safe haven for
terrorists to plot attacks against our country," he said. "These objectives, not
timetables set by politicians in Washington, will drive our force levels in
Iraq."
Still, some said they had hoped to hear more specific benchmarks.
"The American public, the Iraqi people and our brave troops still don't have
any clarity about the U.S. military mission in Iraq," said Sen. Russ Feingold.
The president's approach received a warmer welcome from several House
Democrats whom Bush hosted at the White House for a top-level Iraq briefing
before his speech.
"There was a dose of reality that I have not heard before," said Rep. Steve
Israel.
|