• <nav id="c8c2c"></nav>
      • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
      • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
      • <nav id="c8c2c"><sup id="c8c2c"></sup></nav>
        <tr id="c8c2c"></tr>
      • a级毛片av无码,久久精品人人爽人人爽,国产r级在线播放,国产在线高清一区二区

          Home>News Center>World
                 
         

        Annan: US bid to limit new global court is 'wrong'
        (Agencies)
        Updated: 2004-06-18 08:41

        U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan sharply criticized the United States on Thursday for seeking another exemption from the International Criminal Court, particularly in light of the Iraqi prisoner scandal.


        UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan sharply criticized the United States on June 17, 2004 for seeking another exemption from the International Criminal Court, particularly in light of the Iraqi prisoner scandal. Annan holds a paper doves given to him by students at a public school in Sao Paulo, June 15. [Reuters]
        "The blanket exemption is wrong. It is of dubious judicial value and I don't think it should be encouraged by the council," Annan told reporters.

        The Bush administration, for the third year, is seeking to renew a Security Council resolution that would exempt from the court's prosecution military and civilian personnel "related to a UN-authorized operation" such as that in Iraq.

        The immunity is extended to all nations not among the 94 countries that have ratified a treaty establishing the new court. The resolution expires by the end of the month.

        "It would be unfortunate for one to press for such an exemption, given the prisoner abuse in Iraq, " Annan said. "It would discredit the council and the United Nations that stands for rule of law."

        The United States is investigating abuse, including sexual humiliation, of prisoners by the U.S. military in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

        Security Council envoys say Washington does not yet have enough support or will barely reach the required nine "yes" votes needed for the resolution to pass in the 15-nation body.

        Among the 15 council members, Germany, France, Spain, Brazil, Chile, Benin and Romania, are expected to abstain. But some, like Romania, are reluctant to be responsible for failure of the resolution, if it dies by one vote.

        Crucial is whether China, which has criticized the resolution, casts an abstention. Diplomats say Beijing is seeking some concessions from Washington on Taiwan, although China's U.N. ambassador, Wang Guangya, denies this.


        Bruce DeCell, the father-in-law of attack victim Mark Retrocelli, holds a memorial to those killed in the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, during the National Commission on Terrorists Attacks Upon the United States (9-11 Commission) hearing in Washington, June 16, 2004. Investigators have found no evidence Iraq aided al Qaeda attempts to strike the United States, the commission said on Wednesday in a report that undermines Bush administration arguments for war. [Reuters]
        The resolution is opposed by European nations, except for Britain, which says Washington would veto U.N. peacekeeping missions as it did on one operation three years ago, although U.S. officials have not made that threat yet this year.

        Asked whether this might be the last time Washington was seeking a renewal, State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said he knew of no changes.

        "I'm not trying to change anything at this moment," Boucher said in Washington. "I'm saying we're talking with others about how to proceed. "

        WAR CRIMES

        The council voted unanimously last week on a measure endorsing the new Baghdad interim government and U.S. troops to keep order. But that unity could be shattered by the court exemption issue at a time when the Bush administration is searching for peacekeepers in Iraq.

        The court, the first permanent global war crimes tribunal, was set up to prosecute the world's worst atrocities, such as genocide, mass war crimes and systematic human rights abuses.

        Based in The Hague, Netherlands, it is a court of last resort. Analysts say it would not, for example, interfere in the abuse of Iraqi prisoners as long as a country's judicial system probed the allegations.

        The Bush administration is opposed in principle to an international court having any jurisdiction over American soldiers abroad and has signed bilateral agreements with dozens of nations to exempt any American officials.

        "Our concern about the court being fundamentally flawed in no way reflects our lack of determination to ensure that the perpetrators of these abhorrent crimes (in Iraq) are fully prosecuted," said Richard Grenell, spokesman for U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte.



         
          Today's Top News     Top World News
         

        Tashkent Declaration marks new phase for SCO

         

           
         

        Terrorism part of Taiwan separatist agenda

         

           
         

        Financial sector under scrutiny

         

           
         

        FM refutes US claims of negative relations

         

           
         

        Japanese experts arrive in Qiqihar

         

           
         

        Whampoa marks 80th anniversary

         

           
          Annan: US bid to limit new global court is 'wrong'
           
          Bush insists on Iraq-al Qaeda links despite report
           
          Rumsfeld: US hid Iraqi prisoner from Red Cross
           
          Radio record paints chilling 9/11 picture
           
          Bombers kill 41 in strikes on Iraqi forces
           
          9/11 panel: One jet might have been stopped
           
         
          Go to Another Section  
         
         
          Story Tools  
           
          Related Stories  
           
        US general: I'm told to treat POWS like 'dog'
           
        Four British soldiers charged with abuse
           
        US unit says gave earlier report of Iraq abuse-NYT
           
        Memo says Bush not restricted by torture bans
           
        Two marines plead guilty to Iraqi abuse
           
        US Army saw prison violations last fall
          News Talk  
          Does the approval of UN resolution on Iraq end daily bloodshed there?  
        Advertisement
                 
        a级毛片av无码
        • <nav id="c8c2c"></nav>
          • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
          • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
          • <nav id="c8c2c"><sup id="c8c2c"></sup></nav>
            <tr id="c8c2c"></tr>