• <nav id="c8c2c"></nav>
      • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
      • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
      • <nav id="c8c2c"><sup id="c8c2c"></sup></nav>
        <tr id="c8c2c"></tr>
      • a级毛片av无码,久久精品人人爽人人爽,国产r级在线播放,国产在线高清一区二区

        US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
        Business / Opinion

        How real is the tax burden

        By Jia Kang (China Daily) Updated: 2014-03-04 08:22

        The debate on the tax burden is growing among Chinese as they become more conscious about being taxpayers. A recent Chinese Academy of Social Sciences report has added vigor to that debate by saying that "the per capita tax burden in China is nearly 10,000 yuan ($1,633)".

        Perhaps taxpayers' misconception about "per capita tax burden" is to blame for the renewed debate. "Per capita tax burden" is the same as "average fiscal revenue". Academics and government officials are known to use the concept of "macro tax burden", which takes into account the ratio of total government revenue in a country's GDP. But the concept of "per capita tax burden" is relatively new to us.

        How real is the tax burden

        How real is the tax burden

         
        The difference in the expressions of "per capita tax burden" and "average fiscal revenue" can be significant. Although the two terms refer to the same thing economically, people could derive different meanings from them. If we quantify the tax burden to every single citizen, people will dislike it. But they will be more than happy to accept an increase in average fiscal revenue.

        The "macro tax burden" index can be more meaningful while measuring a country's tax burden, because the ratio of fiscal revenue accounting for GDP can better reflect the concentration ratio of government financial resources in a specific economic structure, and manifest certain fiscal and taxation systems. It also can analyze the characteristics of an economy's financial allocation and the government's role in controlling its resources for administration.

        If we compare this index with the international level, going by the International Monetary Fund's standards, China's current ratio is less than 35 percent, which is the average of developing countries but much lower than that of advanced economies. This means China's macro tax burden is not that high and there is little sense in introducing a "per capita tax" index by quantifying the macro tax burden to individuals. For one thing, it can easily cause misunderstandings among the public. In China, less than 10 percent of the government's total tax comes directly from individuals, with companies paying more than 90 percent. This is because the tax system is aimed at redistributing social wealth from better-off groups to the poorer ones.

        A deeper analysis of the tax burden, however, will show that not all the amount companies pay as taxes comes from their own pockets. Except for the corporate income tax, companies pass on the other taxes such as value-added tax and business tax to parties down the supply/delivery chain or ultimately to consumers. Such a tax is called "indirect tax". In China, indirect tax makes up the main part of the tax system, and it is the key to understanding the tax burden issue.

        Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

        Hot Topics

        Editor's Picks
        ...
        ...
        a级毛片av无码
        • <nav id="c8c2c"></nav>
          • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
          • <tfoot id="c8c2c"><noscript id="c8c2c"></noscript></tfoot>
          • <nav id="c8c2c"><sup id="c8c2c"></sup></nav>
            <tr id="c8c2c"></tr>